Author Archive

Getting Our Christian Business Cards – or NOT

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 by Art

I’ll admit, this seems like making a fuss over nothing.

I’m used to having business cards in the world of work. It is a convenient way to exchange contact information, and it’s expected. Of course, you want good quality stock and a good looking layout/color scheme, etc. The card represents you. Maybe creating a “Christian business card” wouldn’t occur to some people, but to me, it seemed a natural tool one would use. Read the rest of this entry »

New Apartment – Interesting Facts

Saturday, June 12th, 2010 by Art

Well, so I started digging around for ideas and resources from others who are working to reach apartment communities. Rather stunned to learn that in cities:

  1. Just over half the people live in apartments vs homes (within city limits)
  2. 40% of those in homes are considered “churched”
  3. Only 5% of those in apartments are “churched”

Gave me chills. Kept looking, found the National Multi-Housing Council site. More good news for the Good News. Some tidbits from their site: Read the rest of this entry »

Now what?

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 by Art

Well, this week and we should have the last of the new furniture delivered. Next week we house sit/dog babysit for my son for a week back in Cary. Then, we’re pretty much finally here.

Um, now what? Where do you do when the start gun finally goes off?

We have made some progress in getting to know people in the area, but now that we are here morning, noon and night, there is so much more time to give to loving people. Here are some of the things we are doing. Please feel free to offer advice or other ideas (please, really). Read the rest of this entry »

The Seven Themes of Unity in Acts and the Epistles

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010 by Art

For those of you who follow Alan Knox’s blog with me, you know he has been challenging us to consider unity, and especially to consider how we mistakenly build or break unity based on (often emotionally laden) doctrinal differences. *sigh* Me, too.

Thinking about this, I’ve noticed that God took extraordinary measures to maintain unity in the early church. I’m planning individual posts on the seven themes of unity found in Acts and the Epistles. They are:

  1. Acts 2-6 Hellenist Widow Division – Unifying the Jew
  2. Acts 8 The Samaritan Division – Unifying the Half Jew
  3. Acts 10-15 The Gentile Division – Unifying those Cut Off
  4. Acts 19 The Disciples of John Division – Unifying those Left Behind
  5. I Cor The Divisions Based on Men and Doctrines – The False Unities
  6. III Jn The Independence Division of Diotrephes – The False Leaders
  7. Rev 3 The Division Between the Church and Jesus Christ – The False Members Read the rest of this entry »

Is Leadership A Healthy Christian Aim?

Friday, April 30th, 2010 by Art

This article by Steve Williamson says something worth hearing. Here’s the first few paragraphs…

As I move in and out of a variety of Christian circles, I hear much talk about developing Christian leaders for the next generation.  Christian bookstores are brimming with bestsellers touting the latest “leadership secrets” of Jesus or popular Christian celebrity.  Many churches and Christian schools target the development of “leaders who will make an impact” as a necessity for their institution to survive in the Christian marketplace.  Christian parents and seminary candidates are seduced by slogans such as “Preparing Christian Leaders for Tomorrow’s World.”  Clearly, this kind of thinking sells.  Christian day schools, colleges, and seminaries are using the leadership lure in their marketing, guaranteeing that their graduating students will be Christian leaders after they graduate.

That’s quite a promise.  But is it a good one?

Leadership is never an aim for the Christian in the Bible.  In the English Standard Version, “lead” occurs 128 times in 124 verses while “leader” appears 85 times in 80 verses.  Comparatively, “serve” appears 322 times in 294 verses while “servant” occurs 1060 times in 939 verses.  Word usage alone, of course, does not settle the question, but those are compelling numbers. Further, the Christian is never commanded nor even encouraged to lead (except when already in a position of leadership, see Romans 12).  What is modeled, extolled, and commanded is servant-hood.

Read the full article

On Mobility (and the vision for CTF)

Monday, April 26th, 2010 by Art
In discussion with a friend, the question about mobility came up. I wanted to share some of that on the blog.
> 1. What does it mean to be mobile?> Mobility should be considered in regards to the work, and not the worker.> The work involves temporarily assisting churches being planted or temporarily assisting churches working through change/issues. The core of that work also includes developing elders locally and other itinerants in the process (deeply OJT disciple-making at heart–see II Tim 2:2). Being mobile means we can live with existing or developing elders and with other itinerants for a season, to provide both us and them intense, mutually discipling relationships. Being mobile means we can help more than one person and the church in more than one place often, and these in turn, others, to produce a multiplicative effect.> In regards to the temporary nature of the work, we are engaged in any one place only for a relatively brief time (ranging in the biblical accounts we have to consider, from 3 weeks on the short side, probably 3 to 6 months typically, and on the outside a year or two). see http://churchtaskforce.org/resources/pauls-methods for an outline of this in Paul’s life. By defining the mobility based on the work and not the worker, we focus on the purpose and nature (which are helping and developing temporarily), and not the fact that this often, but not necessarily, means a transient existence for the workers.> It may be that you will find yourself moving from city to city, country to country, to pursue temporarily helping plant or strengthen churches in parallel with mutually developing servanthood in others (disciple-making together). But, it may also be, that there are so many hurting churches in just the area or region where you live that in your lifetime you could stay within an hour or two of home to do your work.> In fact, back in 2000, that was the conceptualization I started working through with the idea of “Church Task Force.” If itinerants are normative (and I’m convinced they are), then God has called people to this work. And since most people today live in or near large cities (worldwide), then there are also concentrations of these itinerantly-gifted folks (apostles, prophets, evangelists) in these locations, and there are concentrations of STRUGGLING, CONFUSED churches in these areas. For example, there are 1,600 hundred evangelical churches within a two hour drive of Raleigh, NC. If there were several teams of itinerants here, and each team could help a church for an average of 4 months, each team could only help 3 churches a year. Say, five teams. 15 churches a year. Say, for the next 10 years. 150 churches could be helped/planted. That is less than 1% of the churches, at least 80% of which (we’re told over and over) have plateaued or are shrinking (and there are worse sorts of statistics, like very little life transformation in this present unhealthy church environment, very few new souls reached with the gospel, large segments of society completely ignorant of the gospel, and having little evidence of God based on those around them who say they know Him.> If we had 5 teams of itinerants in every major city in the world today, we could effectively reach and serve 1% of the churches in the world in the next ten years. Seems paltry. This is what faced our Lord, and what faced Paul, but they both chose to start with a small group to get an immensely big job done. Remember, each church reached becomes a bright light in the community for other churches to follow (see I Thess 1:7-10). The multiplicative effect of this–if you can imagine just some of the churches these folks helped or planted would grow and mature, would see the church restored and transforming lives and lifestyles, if sacrificial living and joyful sharing of hearts were to begin to infect communities and workplaces–well, we might see again what we saw in the NT, and once again the church might turn the world upside down, everywhere being spoken about, filling it with the news and evidence of Jesus the Lord.> That is, in fact, the vision behind Church Task Force. To see these teams emerge across major cities and yet reach into the smaller towns in the region. To help them understand their calling. Especially to understand the flexibility in differences for each church in the how, where and why as they fulfill the what and why (or, the the unchangeable principles and functions vs the flexible practices and forms). To help them understand how we fit with and yet become a contrast to the surrounding culture. To help them connect with each other and with struggling churches. So, in terms of mobility, defined by the work, you could fulfill your calling throughout your lifetime without ever moving your home once. You may well move out from your region, and travel more widely. Many will as He leads. But you MUST move where you are serving frequently to do the temporary work of itinerants in helping and developing.> Since today, the work of itinerants is misunderstood or not even considered an option for most of these people, they are stuck trying to fit their triangular little selves into square pegs. They either don’t fill those spaces well, or they don’t fit at all. They are distorted in many ways as their drive to serve tries to fit into what is available. They start “para church” organizations, they go into missionary work, they start churches and remain as “founding pastors” (by the way, a biblical oxymoron), they go to seminaries, they drop out of the church world, they rail against the church–in short, they do not fulfill their calling, and the church is crippled, losing a key component of its design.> One of the missing links has been a way to effectively provide the biblical foundation for those catching this vision–and Tim’s manual, “God’s Plan for Church Planting” very well fits that bill. We have a four day workshop to “turn the lights on” for those with this calling. We have the material online, but that needs to be condensed and used as an intro to whet the appaetite for the workshop. And, the workshop needs to whet the appetite for working together with others as itinerants in planting new churches and in helping struggling churches. To effectively train ourselves, we need to spend time together in the work, not just in transferring information.> After 25 years of study, pondering, fussing and frankly fuming at times, the idea of Church Task Force emerged in 2000. So, you can see, it has been 10 years in getting to this point, where a few people are talking together about these things, where the workshops are set to go, where the website is building content on the topic, and where those with itinerant callings are connecting. The site content is really a first draft of material for a book on the itinerants. I’m hoping several of you will be contributors to that material and book.> The current state of the church, I believe, is in part due to this lack. Itinerants are like the white blood cells of the Body, rushing to the scene of an infection, fighting it, and then dissipating. They help keep the Body healthy. They lay solid foundations for new churches, who themselves contribute to the example given to other churches in the areas of practical faith, sacrificial love and endurance-enabling hope (more on this when we discuss measuring effectiveness).> So, “Church Task Force.” What if we could find ways to connect with these folks? What if we could help them understand the nature of their calling, see the church differently (especially understanding principles vs the variety of practices to fulfill the principles) and begin to function the way itinerants function? What if we could begin to work together to temporarily assist churches and develop servant workers in and among the churches?> 2. How do you develop a self supported ministry that allows one to be mobile?> If you are thinking paid ministry, I don’t think this is what God is wanting from us. By your term, “self-supporting,” I’m assuming you are asking about how to support yourself as you work itinerantly.> I think each worker needs to be willing to live on a lot less than our society expects. The first steps to mobility are to lower debt and lower needed income. This is much easier when your children are raised or you are single. The next step is what work you do.>> If you reach into a region from your present base, this might be a less difficult question. But I still would not choose a career that laid heavy responsibility on me, such that I spent evenings, weekends, and mornings worrying about the business or institution where I work. I simply need some where I can earn enough money to support myself and others. If I were picking a career over again, I would think of nursing, or IT. In both of these, part time work will support you well.> We can live and serve on so much less than we imagine. Always rethink anything you do that takes money to function. Do you need a loudspeaker system and tents to have a picnic ministry, or just a lawn chair and a grill? Do you need to rent a building to hold meetings or lay out your living room differently? Don’t let finances drive your ministry needs, or it won’t be reproducible and it will hinder your reliance on the Spirit of God to bring results and to lead you.> yours,
1. What does it mean to be mobile?
Mobility should be considered in regards to the work, and not the worker.
The work involves temporarily assisting churches being planted or temporarily assisting churches working through change/issues. The core of that work also includes developing elders locally and other itinerants in the process (deeply OJT disciple-making at heart–see II Tim 2:2). Being mobile means we can live with existing or developing elders and with other itinerants for a season, to provide both us and them intense, mutually discipling relationships. Being mobile means we can help more than one person and the church in more than one place often, and these in turn, others, to produce a multiplicative effect.
In regards to the temporary nature of the work, we are engaged in any one place only for a relatively brief time (ranging in the biblical accounts we have to consider, from 3 weeks on the short side, probably 3 to 6 months typically, and on the outside a year or two). see http://churchtaskforce.org/resources/pauls-methods for an outline of this in Paul’s life. By defining the mobility based on the work and not the worker, we focus on the purpose and nature (which are helping and developing temporarily), and not the fact that this often, but not necessarily, means a transient existence for the workers.
It may be that you will find yourself moving from city to city, country to country, to pursue temporarily helping plant or strengthen churches in parallel with mutually developing servanthood in others (disciple-making together). But, it may also be, that there are so many hurting churches in just the area or region where you live that in your lifetime you could stay within an hour or two of home to do your work.
In fact, back in 2000, that was the conceptualization I started working through with the idea of “Church Task Force.” If itinerants are normative (and I’m convinced they are), then God has called people to this work. And since most people today live in or near large cities (worldwide), then there are also concentrations of these itinerantly-gifted folks (apostles, prophets, evangelists) in these locations, and there are concentrations of STRUGGLING, CONFUSED churches in these areas. For example, there are 1,600 hundred evangelical churches within a two hour drive of Raleigh, NC. If there were several teams of itinerants here, and each team could help a church for an average of 4 months, each team could only help 3 churches a year. Say, five teams. 15 churches a year. Say, for the next 10 years. 150 churches could be helped/planted. That is less than 1% of the churches, at least 80% of which (we’re told over and over) have plateaued or are shrinking (and there are worse sorts of statistics, like very little life transformation in this present unhealthy church environment, very few new souls reached with the gospel, large segments of society completely ignorant of the gospel, and having little evidence of God based on those around them who say they know Him.
If we had 5 teams of itinerants in every major city in the world today, we could effectively reach and serve 1% of the churches in the world in the next ten years. Seems paltry. This is what faced our Lord, and what faced Paul, but they both chose to start with a small group to get an immensely big job done. Remember, each church reached becomes a bright light in the community for other churches to follow (see I Thess 1:7-10). The multiplicative effect of this–if you can imagine just some of the churches these folks helped or planted would grow and mature, would see the church restored and transforming lives and lifestyles, if sacrificial living and joyful sharing of hearts were to begin to infect communities and workplaces–well, we might see again what we saw in the NT, and once again the church might turn the world upside down, everywhere being spoken about, filling it with the news and evidence of Jesus the Lord.
That is, in fact, the vision behind Church Task Force. To see these teams emerge across major cities and yet reach into the smaller towns in the region. To help them understand their calling. Especially to understand the flexibility in differences for each church in the how, where and why as they fulfill the what and why (or, the the unchangeable principles and functions vs the flexible practices and forms). To help them understand how we fit with and yet become a contrast to the surrounding culture. To help them connect with each other and with struggling churches. So, in terms of mobility, defined by the work, you could fulfill your calling throughout your lifetime without ever moving your home once. You may well move out from your region, and travel more widely. Many will as He leads. But you MUST move where you are serving frequently to do the temporary work of itinerants in helping and developing.
Since today, the work of itinerants is misunderstood or not even considered an option for most of these people, they are stuck trying to fit their triangular little selves into square pegs. They either don’t fill those spaces well, or they don’t fit at all. They are distorted in many ways as their drive to serve tries to fit into what is available. They start “para church” organizations, they go into missionary work, they start churches and remain as “founding pastors” (by the way, a biblical oxymoron), they go to seminaries, they drop out of the church world, they rail against the church–in short, they do not fulfill their calling, and the church is crippled, losing a key component of its design.
One of the missing links has been a way to effectively provide the biblical foundation for those catching this vision–and Tim’s manual, “God’s Plan for Church Planting” very well fits that bill. We have a four day workshop to “turn the lights on” for those with this calling. We have the material online, but that needs to be condensed and used as an intro to whet the appaetite for the workshop. And, the workshop needs to whet the appetite for working together with others as itinerants in planting new churches and in helping struggling churches. To effectively train ourselves, we need to spend time together in the work, not just in transferring information.
After 25 years of study, pondering, fussing and frankly fuming at times, the idea of Church Task Force emerged in 2000. So, you can see, it has been 10 years in getting to this point, where a few people are talking together about these things, where the workshops are set to go, where the website is building content on the topic, and where those with itinerant callings are connecting. The site content is really a first draft of material for a book on the itinerants. I’m hoping several of you will be contributors to that material and book.
The current state of the church, I believe, is in part due to this lack. Itinerants are like the white blood cells of the Body, rushing to the scene of an infection, fighting it, and then dissipating. They help keep the Body healthy. They lay solid foundations for new churches, who themselves contribute to the example given to other churches in the areas of practical faith, sacrificial love and endurance-enabling hope (more on this when we discuss measuring effectiveness).
So, “Church Task Force.” What if we could find ways to connect with these folks? What if we could help them understand the nature of their calling, see the church differently (especially understanding principles vs the variety of practices to fulfill the principles) and begin to function the way itinerants function? What if we could begin to work together to temporarily assist churches and develop servant workers in and among the churches?
2. How do you develop a self supported ministry that allows one to be mobile?
If you are thinking paid ministry, I don’t think this is what God is wanting from us. By your term, “self-supporting,” I’m assuming you are asking about how to support yourself as you work itinerantly.
I think each worker needs to be willing to live on a lot less than our society expects. The first steps to mobility are to lower debt and lower needed income. This is much easier when your children are raised or you are single. The next step is what work you do.
If you reach into a region from your present base, this might be a less difficult question. But I still would not choose a career that laid heavy responsibility on me, such that I spent evenings, weekends, and mornings worrying about the business or institution where I work. I simply need some where I can earn enough money to support myself and others. If I were picking a career over again, I would think of nursing, or IT. In both of these, part time work will support you well.
We can live and serve on so much less than we imagine. Always rethink anything you do that takes money to function. Do you need a loudspeaker system and tents to have a picnic ministry, or just a lawn chair and a grill? Do you need to rent a building to hold meetings or lay out your living room differently? Don’t let finances drive your ministry needs, or it won’t be reproducible and it will hinder your reliance on the Spirit of God to bring results and to lead you.

In discussion with some friends, the question about mobility came up. I wanted to share some of that on the blog.

1. What does it mean to be mobile?

Mobility should be considered in regards to the work, and not the worker.

The work involves temporarily assisting churches being planted or temporarily assisting troubled churches. The core of that work also includes developing elders locally and other itinerants in the process (the work is deeply OJT disciple-making at heart–see II Tim 2:2). Being mobile means we can live with existing or developing elders and with other itinerants for a season, to provide both us and them intense, mutually discipling relationships. Being mobile means we can help more than one person and the church in more than one place often, and these in turn, others, to produce a multiplicative effect.

In regards to the temporary nature of the work, we are engaged in any one place only for a relatively brief time (ranging in the biblical accounts we have to consider, from 3 weeks on the short side, probably 3 to 6 months typically, and on the outside a year or two). See Pauls methods for an outline of this in Paul’s life. By defining the mobility based on the work and not the worker, we focus on the purpose and nature (which are temporarily helping and developing), and not the fact that this often, but not necessarily, means a transient existence for the workers. Read the rest of this entry »

New Apartment

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010 by Art

I’m excited this morning. For the past couple of months Deb and I have been looking to move into one of the many large apartment complexes near work. We’ve walked the grounds, met some people, made some friends, and prayed. Several of the folks at work live in these communities. One of our goals is to find natural ways to connect with and care for unsaved people as we work to plant a church.

A few weeks ago, on our way to a picnic we were hosting for about 20 people (friends we’re getting to know in that side of town), we drove past some apartments we hadn’t seen. We’d already pretty much decided, with reasonable logic, on another complex. Just to be sure that we pursued any and every nudge by God, we checked this last one out before signing the lease elsewhere. Well, sure enough, as so often in following the God of the last minute (always on time, never late, and–frustratingly for type A’s–never early), our Logical choice gave way to a calm conviction of heart. We’ve signed a lease at The Trails. Now what? Read the rest of this entry »

What are you saying? (A discipleship scale with missional message matrix.)

Friday, April 16th, 2010 by Art

Both the Engel Scale and the Gray Matrix helped us better think about evangelism from the perspective of the lost. They help us understand that the unsaved person comes to faith through an incremental series of steps in either knowledge or attitude. But how do we see ourselves contributing?

We ARE in the world

There is a lot of talk about being missional and incarnational today. The fact is, all Christians are missional and incarnational by virtue of being His and being left in the world. We may be inadvertently and unintentionally sending some ugly messages about God and the Gospel. I think the point is to be intentional about these things.

Here is a proposed discpleship scale and the corresponding missional message matrix that allows us to examine the ourselves and the impact our lives have in presenting and representing the gospel as we live in the world.

Discipleship Scale 3.1

Read the rest of this entry »

In Search of the Right Way

Monday, April 12th, 2010 by Art

The church today is filled with new models and new ventures, new approaches and new theories. We know the church is broken and we are groaning for change. In our desperation, we are turning everywhere to seek the right path. Logic, pragmatism, social theory, leadership theory, business models, marketing methods. Some, in their desire to find the right way, are re-examining the scriptures. Where better to turn? T. Austin Sparks well said, “The whole New Testament (Bible, if you like) is concerned with how things ought to be.”

It is not a difficult matter to ask how things should be when we read scripture. Nor is it difficult to see how far we are from the way things should be. While it looks deceptively simple to move from one to the other, it is enormously difficult to do so, because we rely on ourselves for a work that is foremost spiritual in nature. For example, in I Chron 13 God finds fault, not in David’s desire to move the Ark from where it should not be to where it should, but in how he chose to do so.

The Ark should be in Jerusalem, but it lay in the house of Abinadab for twenty years after the ill-conceived plan to use it as a weapon against the Philistines. David consulted with the leaders and with the people and all agreed it should be brought home.  This was the simple part, much like the task facing the churches today. It isn’t that we don’t know what is wrong. So what does David do next (and what will we)? Read the rest of this entry »

In Search of Well Done

Sunday, April 11th, 2010 by Art

There is in our hearts a desire to please, to be seen in a good light, to be esteemed. I don’t think we can escape this, nor does it seem evil in itself. This is a large part of the glue of social systems: it is why we learn all the little cultural cues and values–so we can fit in, so others will not look down at us and so we will not be seen as odd. Reputation matters to people. In the world, peer pressure itself is neutral, bringing good or bad results to a society.

Jesus also had a heart with a desire to please. The object of His desire was different: “I do always those things that please [my Father]” -Jn 8:29. But regarding men,  Jesus made Himself “of no reputation,” refused to defend Himself, suffered as an evildoer in the opinion of the world, and now we are graciously invited to “go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach.” Read the rest of this entry »